- 註冊時間
- 2023-5-6
- 精華
- 在線時間
- 小時
- 米币
-
- 最後登錄
- 1970-1-1
累計簽到:5 天 連續簽到:1 天
|
Sexual Precocity in a 16-Month-Old4 D2 E" k! Q) X) c c) j, Q
Boy Induced by Indirect Topical
! o, K' t3 x9 g4 IExposure to Testosterone
5 i1 u* U( e' M. rSamar K. Bhowmick, MD, FACE,1 Tracy Ricke, MD,2
" r1 V: V* _3 [2 Cand Kenneth R. Rettig, MD1
T+ [( ?; c( R* w. nClinical Pediatrics5 W: V' s4 V. Y+ f# o, z0 H
Volume 46 Number 67 Q9 W6 h. n* O' P# g8 ?
July 2007 540-543! T' D, `3 t/ d" f
© 2007 Sage Publications
+ f. G) w7 N, v10.1177/0009922806296651
! J @/ }$ c& uhttp://clp.sagepub.com9 }2 Z2 B) {8 z z1 {
hosted at
. p& u/ h* Y; t* O2 {0 s/ Ahttp://online.sagepub.com1 Z! O/ o3 s( L9 j, e& j( L
Precocious puberty in boys, central or peripheral,- J0 v8 G0 g, K% t! y0 ?
is a significant concern for physicians. Central: F, F# s, r( {0 U+ ^2 n6 R* R
precocious puberty (CPP), which is mediated( N! t+ [. X# a/ F4 c
through the hypothalamic pituitary gonadal axis, has L+ A, N8 u, O5 s3 ^" m/ r) l7 v) T
a higher incidence of organic central nervous system
( f& r) w) V, e* A5 Jlesions in boys.1,2 Virilization in boys, as manifested/ g- s& o: F5 ^1 E& t
by enlargement of the penis, development of pubic
$ F! I; S g/ s" ^1 `, whair, and facial acne without enlargement of testi-
+ t5 t* s! P" J9 P* Xcles, suggests peripheral or pseudopuberty.1-3 We
1 k- Y8 H; D1 [0 ^; M/ z( jreport a 16-month-old boy who presented with the. p: A, Q1 [6 F& w
enlargement of the phallus and pubic hair develop-
6 k& \: A( \7 \2 b4 mment without testicular enlargement, which was due5 ~$ W, h; [2 B
to the unintentional exposure to androgen gel used by& G) Z- f* _' ~' C
the father. The family initially concealed this infor-" W8 H- T1 f% n0 Z
mation, resulting in an extensive work-up for this
: T) j. i; {- @; p0 b% Q- u" pchild. Given the widespread and easy availability of
( B! h4 R5 S: H+ y3 F! P0 ^testosterone gel and cream, we believe this is proba-* u+ q" k v* D
bly more common than the rare case report in the
3 M* s6 ]* H+ U( K& K- Aliterature.4
8 |/ Q- K& { }Patient Report
" ~% m1 M4 l6 }- E/ B8 MA 16-month-old white child was referred to the i2 G1 a5 T" ^' ]8 s
endocrine clinic by his pediatrician with the concern
. S7 i6 P" l& ^) o2 }8 t# ^of early sexual development. His mother noticed
7 t+ m; ]# Z) C5 {light colored pubic hair development when he was
0 K4 j+ _% W2 I2 m( ^# K+ G/ K FFrom the 1Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, 2University of5 G- _3 t( f1 s2 _& J9 B
South Alabama Medical Center, Mobile, Alabama., l7 U0 C% ~8 e- x6 y
Address correspondence to: Samar K. Bhowmick, MD, FACE,0 M, D* ~, C3 y
Professor of Pediatrics, University of South Alabama, College of
$ _9 e/ ^" Z9 _$ Q* m' _( vMedicine, 2451 Fillingim St. Mastin 212, Mobile, AL 36617-2297;
1 p, {6 }4 f$ ?$ ^( Ne-mail: [email protected].
1 K) q9 w# y2 |/ \7 f; {% P' iabout 6 to 7 months old, which progressively became
0 w4 e$ k& [4 odarker. She was also concerned about the enlarge-
2 B7 u } V; C* F- ^: Dment of his penis and frequent erections. The child/ r3 H- o0 x- K* T: o. _4 r6 |
was the product of a full-term normal delivery, with
' z9 M+ I" C7 y. _a birth weight of 7 lb 14 oz, and birth length of
* ~( j" Z! G) Y% H20 inches. He was breast-fed throughout the first year0 F& ?1 ]6 ]/ s4 Z% L
of life and was still receiving breast milk along with
- `" L3 ~3 r' I9 V7 Hsolid food. He had no hospitalizations or surgery," t3 r3 Q- U& d! F8 A
and his psychosocial and psychomotor development
) b) Z6 ?+ V' e1 |3 P, j6 J& ?was age appropriate.
! b' z; m4 h& v7 R+ H; {The family history was remarkable for the father,
9 i; O0 e$ J L" }/ i) Jwho was diagnosed with hypothyroidism at age 16,
, D1 X0 f7 d1 Pwhich was treated with thyroxine. The father’s
5 \/ y3 F6 ?4 t( k& `height was 6 feet, and he went through a somewhat
% P9 a) J' r: h# ?2 N3 @early puberty and had stopped growing by age 14.% e' [/ S/ e) J
The father denied taking any other medication. The
' H) W+ Y/ |8 ]5 m+ ichild’s mother was in good health. Her menarche
7 _- U, F+ ~' J7 V" G' Jwas at 11 years of age, and her height was at 5 feet
% I7 f3 E0 Z8 L5 inches. There was no other family history of pre-
/ N6 {$ q' @0 N0 n( {$ z9 zcocious sexual development in the first-degree rela-
: D: l. a, ^: D }5 y) Ptives. There were no siblings.& U, m+ Q" E: p+ Y; F
Physical Examination
% \1 @) m; f u, c7 JThe physical examination revealed a very active,) c& A* l# S) Y; ~! G: y0 \
playful, and healthy boy. The vital signs documented
, W& @: u/ c% z$ P; J- B8 v {6 {a blood pressure of 85/50 mm Hg, his length was" _8 m. C* \ T, Z: i# M3 y7 R
90 cm (>97th percentile), and his weight was 14.4 kg* x8 G4 Z. V- H1 Q+ J+ L3 Z
(also >97th percentile). The observed yearly growth
) `0 e" d4 }' Uvelocity was 30 cm (12 inches). The examination of: A. k2 ~9 P8 _5 [* T
the neck revealed no thyroid enlargement.
9 c3 ?5 {9 A. t8 ZThe genitourinary examination was remarkable for
* `6 e1 s+ X' v+ r0 U M/ Ienlargement of the penis, with a stretched length of; P M& B+ T- w S
8 cm and a width of 2 cm. The glans penis was very well4 r; m5 g, P$ k0 I) X
developed. The pubic hair was Tanner II, mostly around, {. h7 |% W. q
540
+ R/ C" Z" h+ ~, r0 bat University of Manchester Library on May 25, 2015 cpj.sagepub.com Downloaded from
1 Y' [- V: Y. ^the base of the phallus and was dark and curled. The
. N/ o4 s$ W8 R/ w$ Ftesticular volume was prepubertal at 2 mL each.
" B4 l. _% u. ?, w/ qThe skin was moist and smooth and somewhat5 h3 ~0 t9 |; }$ ]6 N+ W. N
oily. No axillary hair was noted. There were no! t( \ Q9 ~7 d3 D- W% i& y3 g
abnormal skin pigmentations or café-au-lait spots.& h" v& a: Q1 J6 Y+ |0 G5 l
Neurologic evaluation showed deep tendon reflex 2+
9 K* c: G$ y/ O8 Ebilateral and symmetrical. There was no suggestion, [: J* ~+ Q, ~2 O& U) R
of papilledema.
$ j" O# r# N4 v% |; {4 K9 cLaboratory Evaluation5 h6 U/ q; B& m2 ^" b
The bone age was consistent with 28 months by
; }' K( G( c" q# q5 A) R+ [3 wusing the standard of Greulich and Pyle at a chrono-
6 {, z: M: B& u6 i( J, ^logic age of 16 months (advanced).5 Chromosomal& L2 E3 j$ W$ T3 e
karyotype was 46XY. The thyroid function test
5 e2 X3 i6 d# t# Ushowed a free T4 of 1.69 ng/dL, and thyroid stimu-; }1 Y: z/ A! h! ]0 d& s9 i- X
lating hormone level was 1.3 µIU/mL (both normal).
9 C k5 T6 L- [; n. b. HThe concentrations of serum electrolytes, blood w; E7 X- J0 @2 c+ _* i& G4 F
urea nitrogen, creatinine, and calcium all were& T" L: L( Q3 e4 M2 }* f8 m$ q- C
within normal range for his age. The concentration9 C7 N$ `1 [8 {: N, @: _
of serum 17-hydroxyprogesterone was 16 ng/dL
' h! _4 p# v( H: `! I6 I(normal, 3 to 90 ng/dL), androstenedione was 20
0 v% T8 E% L3 f+ F; u* i. Yng/dL (normal, 18 to 80 ng/dL), dehydroepiandros-3 k; _% U, H/ Q" Z" Q) D
terone was 38 ng/dL (normal, 50 to 760 ng/dL),; l8 K% k$ Y' }$ L [8 ?
desoxycorticosterone was 4.3 ng/dL (normal, 7 to
5 j. q4 a! z6 w8 O# b" K49ng/dL), 11-desoxycortisol (specific compound S)
- o3 g8 v1 W6 _' g9 M+ J/ X) S+ U* twas 43 ng/dL (normal, 10 to 156 ng/dL), serum cor-
* ]9 h- b! @$ K& c9 ktisol was 7.6 µg/dL (normal, 2.8 to 23 µg/dL), total# e+ K. s* ]: I3 p# `; n: C% M
testosterone was 60 ng/dL (normal <3 to 10 ng/dL),
3 q' _- m* }; J) q: z0 y% Qand β-human chorionic gonadotropin was less than" k! c0 x X# P) c h
5 mIU/mL (normal <5 mIU/mL). Serum follicular
, G) ]) y+ q/ y5 c- p/ n( kstimulating hormone and leuteinizing hormone
: Y/ `, L6 F( ]- j4 xconcentrations were less than 0.05 mIU/mL
5 Z# @- i \) F! I& \$ N(prepubertal).- z5 t; B+ H% ]7 W7 [" w
The parents were notified about the laboratory- U. Q& r& b3 V3 @ g
results and were informed that all of the tests were
( g# ]6 A2 Z; a, Qnormal except the testosterone level was high. The3 t! x/ p, a6 A- a F' Z
follow-up visit was arranged within a few weeks to, N; d8 D* ]$ m* i; W0 e3 N+ r: |
obtain testicular and abdominal sonograms; how-; O* `8 X0 |0 ^ }
ever, the family did not return for 4 months.
0 g1 }, S: j+ d b/ y6 FPhysical examination at this time revealed that the
2 ]& o" x. F( A1 H4 @child had grown 2.5 cm in 4 months and had gained& R, ]- V. t* h3 t' G$ a9 H( g
2 kg of weight. Physical examination remained8 r9 S4 e- N8 c- C2 N, Q7 s; B
unchanged. Surprisingly, the pubic hair almost com-
' x: ^* z" q+ D$ S- W" s7 d) K7 jpletely disappeared except for a few vellous hairs at/ u9 s H# }' N% D8 e- [
the base of the phallus. Testicular volume was still 24 D+ J- N2 }( _, V3 m. r! k
mL, and the size of the penis remained unchanged.0 f' z6 {) C, z* h5 q
The mother also said that the boy was no longer hav-
3 ], ]% Z b( d/ m' ?2 v- Uing frequent erections.1 M2 S7 W3 w9 ? D3 n
Both parents were again questioned about use of/ d- G8 F, s6 b) a- H# Y
any ointment/creams that they may have applied to- w8 a! ^9 r! z1 w1 ]1 k- N' Q
the child’s skin. This time the father admitted the
5 [; }. f; a$ A9 h H4 ]. L: f CTopical Testosterone Exposure / Bhowmick et al 541- V) p% S' F1 [( ^1 _# j
use of testosterone gel twice daily that he was apply-
# X( q8 L2 F0 @0 Zing over his own shoulders, chest, and back area for+ q2 h1 l A; x6 q+ p; I8 ]( p8 A
a year. The father also revealed he was embarrassed
5 x \( ]+ j/ S+ m1 q" Vto disclose that he was using a testosterone gel pre-
# s8 K$ T3 Y3 X* N, L, iscribed by his family physician for decreased libido
. \) t" z& g; X+ @" X5 rsecondary to depression.
5 S( l& v+ E% H, t) ^ h8 \1 XThe child slept in the same bed with parents.
% l( M Q; K7 n d% y- G# Q8 g# }The father would hug the baby and hold him on his( g% R) d# n4 G9 e, H
chest for a considerable period of time, causing sig-) x0 x5 t9 M$ f) ~
nificant bare skin contact between baby and father.
% w+ L# Z; i3 j+ f) n. \The father also admitted that after the phone call,
$ L; \0 l) w9 N m5 gwhen he learned the testosterone level in the baby( E! h- n, P+ I# _ j
was high, he then read the product information
8 T9 A0 d! I! Z$ q6 kpacket and concluded that it was most likely the rea-* | x0 y" T( @' c0 E' N* ~
son for the child’s virilization. At that time, they
6 Q% Z) e( r8 I; J) e8 y2 Sdecided to put the baby in a separate bed, and the
) g5 B* b: K1 Y `3 z/ Kfather was not hugging him with bare skin and had
+ m+ x2 I/ z9 ?6 Z1 U0 \( |been using protective clothing. A repeat testosterone
% m3 t0 e1 B/ i5 @: Utest was ordered, but the family did not go to the
1 v$ M9 C; {! _% c* alaboratory to obtain the test.' J+ Y# T/ A* L0 I7 O: ?! o
Discussion: ?" ~$ q# q& H2 o) s) V; k
Precocious puberty in boys is defined as secondary
& x5 M9 o" O; v7 @ e/ ~' s2 asexual development before 9 years of age.1,4
+ H3 s! g4 R8 k$ ^: o& R0 pPrecocious puberty is termed as central (true) when
- y3 q2 t; ~2 Z6 x) ]1 y7 M Z7 Fit is caused by the premature activation of hypo- T# W4 i6 R5 U0 \
thalamic pituitary gonadal axis. CPP is more com-+ k* \9 c/ @! R8 ^6 U
mon in girls than in boys.1,3 Most boys with CPP
G* A8 d; {1 I! p$ ~2 cmay have a central nervous system lesion that is$ U) {) [. B1 D) H& V2 f
responsible for the early activation of the hypothal-& K* E: o2 m( g3 e/ J
amic pituitary gonadal axis.1-3 Thus, greater empha-0 s' ]7 P3 n+ ^
sis has been given to neuroradiologic imaging in- ^ Q5 ]( E1 C
boys with precocious puberty. In addition to viril-- Q6 H' e \6 S" r
ization, the clinical hallmark of CPP is the symmet-
K5 p0 t. R$ K9 h, D( e7 {+ e% mrical testicular growth secondary to stimulation by
I2 o% z3 C' J0 n sgonadotropins.1,3: G( q F# t, v0 a& b8 V
Gonadotropin-independent peripheral preco-0 a1 i$ A* ]5 V" } A
cious puberty in boys also results from inappropriate
) t# \ P, E* t' @# @# Bandrogenic stimulation from either endogenous or" U, [# f# b. d y
exogenous sources, nonpituitary gonadotropin stim-0 [4 u4 z5 S' _
ulation, and rare activating mutations.3 Virilizing
7 ~3 Z) }1 [6 Z# Bcongenital adrenal hyperplasia producing excessive
: Z0 G2 W" a% _0 m, xadrenal androgens is a common cause of precocious+ ~* J& b+ U& G) I
puberty in boys.3,49 h% R% e+ A# Q; G, H7 g8 l
The most common form of congenital adrenal: C' w* e) `& Z# T3 Z1 z
hyperplasia is the 21-hydroxylase enzyme deficiency." V! x/ g/ r: [# U# o: m
The 11-β hydroxylase deficiency may also result in
: ]" C6 y) F" F8 j' Oexcessive adrenal androgen production, and rarely,$ _* b. I- Y4 V& N% A
an adrenal tumor may also cause adrenal androgen
* d6 c* R4 p$ {excess.1,3% P: a j; S+ Z! A$ b
at University of Manchester Library on May 25, 2015 cpj.sagepub.com Downloaded from
! D3 \( d* R2 B1 D& h542 Clinical Pediatrics / Vol. 46, No. 6, July 2007
, J' U/ |: h5 V5 pA unique entity of male-limited gonadotropin-
6 V& M T- s2 Iindependent precocious puberty, which is also known
% ]+ p0 V5 S6 A& y1 Oas testotoxicosis, may cause precocious puberty at a
4 v1 a( c; ~1 r- b B6 Bvery young age. The physical findings in these boys
# N% n% c* e- T2 o( O) W6 fwith this disorder are full pubertal development,
# u3 Y. Z' O6 B( u+ n+ ]including bilateral testicular growth, similar to boys/ e& B% W! @# D& \) k [
with CPP. The gonadotropin levels in this disorder
0 c( l g( X2 D+ S! @: g4 C% ]( Oare suppressed to prepubertal levels and do not show
. r' [) l, W$ hpubertal response of gonadotropin after gonadotropin-
$ }( T3 q! z6 }' ?4 sreleasing hormone stimulation. This is a sex-linked
( D$ u. b9 W1 l6 C9 oautosomal dominant disorder that affects only
( E1 Q" B( J2 M0 qmales; therefore, other male members of the family& i" Q+ g' I& u f
may have similar precocious puberty.3
! a% M/ A5 ]: ^: q, QIn our patient, physical examination was incon-* `, f! ~9 A8 j7 `* L& v
sistent with true precocious puberty since his testi-5 E# h5 C A# c; _- E
cles were prepubertal in size. However, testotoxicosis
0 `, X6 l/ Q% I2 G' mwas in the differential diagnosis because his father
( @$ k4 m2 X) P q% qstarted puberty somewhat early, and occasionally,5 s W: k& W9 a, D e
testicular enlargement is not that evident in the
3 @# A" @& ^% n; nbeginning of this process.1 In the absence of a neg-- {1 o* T F2 J! ]+ }
ative initial history of androgen exposure, our
! M# G G; R% p% cbiggest concern was virilizing adrenal hyperplasia,6 h9 _3 @9 P% z( j# w& ]: N' }
either 21-hydroxylase deficiency or 11-β hydroxylase* X9 l y M1 T7 O/ a+ N5 v9 Y
deficiency. Those diagnoses were excluded by find-- c) R0 t+ p: c; h; V
ing the normal level of adrenal steroids.) G& H' ^+ t" x1 q: w ~3 |
The diagnosis of exogenous androgens was strongly
1 [* L e( o, T5 I& p H& `suspected in a follow-up visit after 4 months because
, f+ }( h8 G) u2 Y, n$ {the physical examination revealed the complete disap-
2 w1 f/ k4 B) Z4 mpearance of pubic hair, normal growth velocity, and
: v9 H0 Q$ ?9 z# h3 l5 Edecreased erections. The father admitted using a testos-
, g+ u+ ^) c% R5 a+ B1 N% Wterone gel, which he concealed at first visit. He was5 X; f c1 s" p" t; c# {1 g
using it rather frequently, twice a day. The Physicians’3 o4 P& @! h8 M; P1 [) Z
Desk Reference, or package insert of this product, gel or) |4 l4 R0 @6 K% M' r7 Q
cream, cautions about dermal testosterone transfer to5 c e4 J' [. g- ~- K
unprotected females through direct skin exposure.6 `& {5 s4 J, V
Serum testosterone level was found to be 2 times the% F- U5 j# ~+ J/ v ?
baseline value in those females who were exposed to
8 A0 Y- j9 L( Z6 [even 15 minutes of direct skin contact with their male4 h0 _. _. Y( k- f' A, m9 o
partners.6 However, when a shirt covered the applica-* t. P! @# s. i- X) ~- s: I
tion site, this testosterone transfer was prevented.; d' Y$ p9 p6 J. i
Our patient’s testosterone level was 60 ng/mL,
5 F: z( Y5 ?- f) i5 p+ Lwhich was clearly high. Some studies suggest that6 W6 e' C& C5 x) L
dermal conversion of testosterone to dihydrotestos-
+ Q7 b# `; o* s9 J i# W+ R* m# sterone, which is a more potent metabolite, is more
" v5 t* n) V5 }3 ]6 i- @* q2 ]active in young children exposed to testosterone
8 n1 }6 ]& P: F- C2 I' Yexogenously7; however, we did not measure a dihy-; L) K+ x ^# }$ A& P V$ ~0 C
drotestosterone level in our patient. In addition to" X' A0 D: g) q3 y' g6 Y* }5 M
virilization, exposure to exogenous testosterone in
: K5 i K, x+ bchildren results in an increase in growth velocity and
& A( y/ C) `; r/ [( P+ F$ badvanced bone age, as seen in our patient.) q1 R% V5 x$ z9 s3 k
The long-term effect of androgen exposure during
) D5 z/ E- t/ R3 Aearly childhood on pubertal development and final' ?# Z. R3 z: [
adult height are not fully known and always remain
$ W- q5 J3 r( }5 `& W1 `a concern. Children treated with short-term testos-* n3 j5 E" }6 N' Y0 H( A$ S' v( ]
terone injection or topical androgen may exhibit some
9 N& ~5 R" Y8 |7 h4 P) s" vacceleration of the skeletal maturation; however, after
, r- s/ J8 E* E: \cessation of treatment, the rate of bone maturation: b. v8 Y* q. U4 D# {! m
decelerates and gradually returns to normal.8,9
3 D# q3 P. S) f3 z1 wThere are conflicting reports and controversy% D7 b7 ~) O4 S! ?; L
over the effect of early androgen exposure on adult
8 p% K4 R% P' q; k6 G- Ypenile length.10,11 Some reports suggest subnormal% l7 c; } k) Q7 T
adult penile length, apparently because of downreg-5 g. d" `% m% w# p t
ulation of androgen receptor number.10,12 However,! u4 E" | c) m+ x$ X
Sutherland et al13 did not find a correlation between
7 o& R9 ~! W0 A4 O/ c! jchildhood testosterone exposure and reduced adult0 b) v" J7 p6 j2 ^3 M1 A7 |
penile length in clinical studies.
! P4 j* k0 o3 c, ?" Q; aNonetheless, we do not believe our patient is, `9 ]3 h5 d: X# j
going to experience any of the untoward effects from
/ a8 X0 A: u5 ~1 p6 ~: Ktestosterone exposure as mentioned earlier because. @" t5 g1 R* e, _# h( B
the exposure was not for a prolonged period of time.
& |" I( S* \# E0 {* dAlthough the bone age was advanced at the time of' d3 d8 v: l5 @% k! X5 Z' O( A
diagnosis, the child had a normal growth velocity at
4 ?0 T; K* d) @the follow-up visit. It is hoped that his final adult+ k. y# Q1 q+ [# @
height will not be affected.
. T3 b* K5 h. [+ n: L& G* d9 JAlthough rarely reported, the widespread avail-
/ \7 s8 o0 K. f' s6 zability of androgen products in our society may; e& ]5 M; P' T/ \
indeed cause more virilization in male or female
, X9 a L4 l7 s7 O' N, _children than one would realize. Exposure to andro-
[4 y+ X0 ?$ S& W, y) jgen products must be considered and specific ques-
! _5 \3 r- k$ y' N1 Qtioning about the use of a testosterone product or
+ \) M. f( z& r$ Q' ugel should be asked of the family members during
- n8 q1 U. f# B& i: e& [& gthe evaluation of any children who present with vir-" l- p2 v; E# _8 s
ilization or peripheral precocious puberty. The diag-) |4 e, Q# j! [- O5 f, {& X
nosis can be established by just a few tests and by
, W+ |1 q' z- H4 |8 j$ Wappropriate history. The inability to obtain such a: @; \; z- a2 _+ s
history, or failure to ask the specific questions, may. m$ b; m5 d* c6 b6 |( _; e$ k
result in extensive, unnecessary, and expensive$ a8 q, J \6 c: d1 J/ J! [
investigation. The primary care physician should be. z) }2 a( h! } o$ O' Y: _2 @
aware of this fact, because most of these children& x8 G+ x5 _! L( ?% y, L
may initially present in their practice. The Physicians’! w6 W6 w9 `, J6 i" ?' I1 k
Desk Reference and package insert should also put a; }; s/ Q8 J& @& Q) d( G% R; h) `3 k
warning about the virilizing effect on a male or% q* }1 `0 }7 |3 k: K' c
female child who might come in contact with some-
, ~% J5 ]4 v9 b6 |1 Jone using any of these products.
; g `% o4 @5 y4 M2 i( {' SReferences
' b; J: ^, P, r! J- z1. Styne DM. The testes: disorder of sexual differentiation2 A5 U8 `/ [# s3 H7 c
and puberty in the male. In: Sperling MA, ed. Pediatric
; z# n1 z4 A# `& R8 ~) sEndocrinology. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders;
0 p4 a/ o! m3 F4 x( H+ @. d% `+ T% I2002: 565-628.
& [6 ^: c' N$ L6 }3 M' t7 k2. Rivarola M, Belgorosky A, Mendilaharzu H, et al. Precocious! Q' J5 R1 i3 X7 K* w
puberty in children with tumours of the suprasellar pineal |
|